Correction loop
Immediate Corrective Feedback
Hattie & Timperley, 2007. A parent-friendly explanation of what the research says and how it shaped SupΣrLearnΣr.
Learning engine
mastery graph + memory schedule + parent signals
Prereq
mastered
Core skill
review
Reasoning
solid
Next concept
ready
Exam fluency
future
adaptive decision
Review the core skill, then unlock reasoning
spaced review
D7
D14
D25
D50
D75
sample parent evidence
teacher layer
Designed by IITians with real teachers.
What the study tells us
Feedback works best when it helps a learner understand where they are, what good performance looks like, and what to do next.
Why parents should care
A wrong answer should not become a private dead end. It should become the clearest moment for teaching.
How it shaped the product
What SupΣrLearnΣr changes because of this evidence.
This is where research becomes architecture: the study influences the rules, screens, and parent signals.
01
Every answer produces a correction loop.
02
Feedback explains the mistake and points to the next action.
03
The system can route students back to the missing concept instead of just marking answers wrong.
What parents see
Product signals built from the study.
The research is visible in the product through concrete signals, not hidden behind slogans.
signal
Specific correction
Shown as part of the learning path, review plan, or parent evidence surface.
signal
Next action
Shown as part of the learning path, review plan, or parent evidence surface.
signal
Concept repair
Shown as part of the learning path, review plan, or parent evidence surface.